Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Talk about anything.

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew

Post Reply
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 24197
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

As we all know Ti pots/pans tend to be expensive and often small ones don't just have enough capacity to knock up a 'proper' meal. With this in mind I set off on an amble across internet land and came up with this.

http://www.tauntonleisure.com/snow-peak ... 83#tdesc_1

It's made in Japan by Snow Peak so the quality isn't in question. It only weighs 45g, is 140mm diameter so it's big enough and best of all it only costs £11.99 ... that's right less than 12 quid. Spend ten minutes fabbing up a foil lid and you're set ;)
May the bridges you burn light your way
didnothingfatal
Posts: 860
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:26 am

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by didnothingfatal »

yes it is, what do you plan on cooking in a wafer thin ti bowl?? Burnt _____________? ;)
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 24197
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

yes it is, what do you plan on cooking in a wafer thin ti bowl??
We'll see ;) ... I've no reason to think the bowl will be thinner than a mug or pot. The weight saving will come from not having a lid or handles. Oddly SP 1400ml pot is lighter than their 900ml pot although they appear the same design ?
May the bridges you burn light your way
Anthony
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:44 pm

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Anthony »

You know the deal, don't believe any weights until its on your scales.
User avatar
Ian
Posts: 4658
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:10 pm
Location: Scotlandshire
Contact:

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Ian »

Oddly SP 1400ml pot is lighter than their 900ml pot although they appear the same design
1400 is 210g, 900 is 175g according to the website you quote above :?

As far as bowls are concerned, if you're just boiling water for re-hydration of dried food or a brew, I can't see any disadvantage.
didnothingfatal
Posts: 860
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:26 am

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by didnothingfatal »

You can't cook in Ti, unless you have a very controllable flame, the only stove I've managed to cook with in a Ti pan is a MSR WindPro. If you're just boiling water to rehydrate why not go the whole hog and get a tinfoil tray like takeaway food comes in??
User avatar
Ian
Posts: 4658
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:10 pm
Location: Scotlandshire
Contact:

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Ian »

You can't cook in Ti, unless you have a very controllable flame
You remember that Red Dwarf episode where Kryten becomes human:

Lister: Any problems?
Kryten: Well, just one or two. In fact I've compiled a little list if you'll indulge me. Now then, uh, my optical system doesn't appear to have a zoom function.
Lister: No, human eyes don't have a zoom.
Kryten: Well then, how do you bring a small object into sharp focus?
Lister: Well, you just move your head closer to the object.

Using a similar principle, I lift the pan a little further above the flame if my food is burning by using my hand/arm, which as I have them with me already doesn't contribute any extra weight to my cooking equipment ;)
User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Matt »

You can't cook in Ti, unless you have a very controllable flame
Yeah you can, of a sort :) Highly controllable coke can stove

Image
Curry and coffee for tea by fantasticmrmatt, on Flickr
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 24197
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

1400 is 210g, 900 is 175g according to the website you quote above
Uhhm, I got my weights from a US site ... I'll do some weighing, I'll also weigh the bowl when it arrives, if it's sub 60g then I reckon it's still a winner ;)
Using a similar principle, I lift the pan a little further above the flame if my food is burning by using my hand/arm, which as I have them with me already doesn't contribute any extra weight to my cooking equipment
:D
May the bridges you burn light your way
bod
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:09 pm
Location: Leicester

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by bod »

didnothingfatal wrote:You can't cook in Ti, unless you have a very controllable flame,
Sure you can; coz I'm a food ponce I regularly cook carbonara/risotto etc. from scratch using fresh ingredients in my Snow Peak ti pans on my Pocket Rocket (or Snow Peak stove whose name escapes me but suffers from valve creep). I might have weighed every piece of kit I own and put it on a spreadsheet but I just can't compromise when it comes to good food. It's lucky I don't like coffee, that'd be a real nightmare!
Anthony
Posts: 583
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:44 pm

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Anthony »

I might have weighed every piece of kit I own and put it on a spreadsheet
Thank goodness I'm not the only one!!!
didnothingfatal
Posts: 860
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 11:26 am

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by didnothingfatal »

Well I'm not going with the cooking with Ti argument! It always seems to chemically fuse with the ti, due to hotspots.
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 24197
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: Cooking in a bowl, not as stupid as it sounds.

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

Here it is ... it's come in a few g heavier than advertised but I still don't think it's bad. The sides are deep enough to allow the use of a 'pot grabber' if you're inclined. It's got a useable capacity of just over 500ml and a total capacity of 650ml. Add a couple of g for a foil lid and away you go ... all things considered I don't think it's bad for £11.99.

Image
May the bridges you burn light your way
Post Reply