
Anyway, big tyre clearance, sensible off-road capable gearing and what looks to be both a simple and clever way of altering the geometry.

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
Actually a very old fashioned idea, one which I introduced to by a very old fashioned member of this very forum.thenorthwind wrote: Maybe this will reveal me as out of touch with some new bike trend, but why is there a wristband round the hub?
Ah, that explains it thenActually a very old fashioned idea, one which I introduced to by a very old fashioned member of this very forum.
Agree, been around for donkeys' years; I can remember having like a toe strap around the hubs back in the seventies but no idea why?!! Keep them clean possibly - not that road bikes (that's what we had them on) get particularly dirty.In Reverse wrote:Actually a very old fashioned idea, one which I introduced to by a very old fashioned member of this very forum.thenorthwind wrote: Maybe this will reveal me as out of touch with some new bike trend, but why is there a wristband round the hub?
I remember these in the '50s, but they were a cylindrical brush shaped into a ring. My father-in-laws bike had oneIn Reverse wrote:
Actually a very old fashioned idea,
I'm not a fan. Make the head tube 1 1/8 with a steel fork that's in proportion to the rest of the frame. Straighten the chainstay, it's just a gimmick. Sack Stevie Wonder as the graphic designer and it's got potential.GregMay wrote:All kinds of correct there in that bike.
I heavily approve.
It allows more tyre and chainring clearance without making the chainstay longer, looks a bit goofy but I could live with itPirahnaStraighten the chainstay, it's just a gimmick. .
It does, but it's a lot of faff for a bit of length there that is no real consequence on a bike that's not really for fast road miles - or if it is for road handling it's at the expense of off-road handling imo. Shorter isn't better once you're off-road. The Open UP did it for valid reasons but I'm not sold on the idea generally (UP is light, tight geometry bike, basically a road bike that can take big tyres more than a true mix-terrain bike - and it uses carbon in the right way, a way you can't really use a squashed tube in that area)it's just a gimmick. .
/
It allows more tyre and chainring clearance without making the chainstay longer
Doesn't matter ... just as long as people think they wouldWould people really change the fork setting more than once when they bought it?
Bearbonesnorm wrote:Doesn't matter ... just as long as people think they wouldWould people really change the fork setting more than once when they bought it?Seems to be a big(ish) swing towards one bike having many roles with 'versatility' being king, so perhaps people would view it in a similar way as they might view adjustable suspension trave / settings?
Some truth in that. Some feel the differences, some don't, some ride better on a bike they agree with, others ride rings around us all on any old bike. There's clearly some value in being able to experiment, U-Turn forks were great in that respect. EBBs are another one I like for making a simple effective change to a bike.I reckon that all that adjustment we are offered is simply marketing, aimed at pandering to the egos of those who like to pretend it makes a difference in the real world.
remember the plastic bread clips that you used to slide over your brake cable outerRIP wrote:"toe strap around the hubs back in the seventies" - I'm hoping, Peter, that you also installed some playing cards attached to the seatstays using clothes pegs and then pushed into the spokes so that they made an entertaining clattering noise as you rode around the estate(*).
We had to make our own entertainment in them there days.
I'm tempted to bring the feature back for WRT.
(*) Bash Street Estate, not Chatsworth, in my case.