To fat for the fred...

Talk about anything.

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew

Post Reply
User avatar
Single Speed George
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:36 pm
Location: Shap

To fat for the fred...

Post by Single Speed George »

http://singletrackworld.com/2016/04/fat ... challenge/ kinda interesting seeing as they allow mountain bikes, and considering the feeds of endurance on fat bikes I have seen by people on here is it right for the fred sportive to ban them...
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 24197
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

Their event, their rules.

I probably wouldn't want 23c shod road bikes doing the BB200 either.
May the bridges you burn light your way
User avatar
Alpinum
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Alpinum »

Isn't it supposed to be about fundraising/charity?
And not about what bike and how etc.?

A quick look didn't reveal any rules stating what bike your allowed to use...(?)

Perhaps the problem was that they asked for an early start, which can be taken for admitting that they're not up for the challenge.

Ach well, in the end it's a stupid place to take a fat bike :roll:
User avatar
Single Speed George
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:36 pm
Location: Shap

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Single Speed George »

Bearbonesnorm wrote:
I probably wouldn't want 23c shod road bikes doing the BB200 either.
chalange accepted ;) hahaha
AlasdairMc
Posts: 1267
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:46 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by AlasdairMc »

Bearbonesnorm wrote:Their event, their rules.

I probably wouldn't want 23c shod road bikes doing the BB200 either.
Why not? Doesn't the lighter tyres make it easier to carry long distances? :wink:
User avatar
Dave Barter
Posts: 3821
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:21 pm

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Dave Barter »

I think it is worth understanding the history of this event to get a "balanced" view. It was set up as a memorial to Fred Whitton who did loads to promote road cycling in the Lakes and was also a fanatical event organiser. Similar to HoNC and 3 Peaks it has been latched onto by many rather than "promoted" to get where it is and (in my view) should not be seen as a commercial sportive, I believe most profit goes to charity. The sponsors are needed as the event has grown so large the Lakes Club can't manage it themselves.

In spirit it is a road cycling challenge dedicated to Fred.
Elite keyboard warrior, DNF'er, Swearer
ianfitz
Posts: 3642
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by ianfitz »

Dave Barter wrote:I think it is worth understanding the history of this event to get a "balanced" view. It was set up as a memorial to Fred Whitton who did loads to promote road cycling in the Lakes and was also a fanatical event organiser. Similar to HoNC and 3 Peaks it has been latched onto by many rather than "promoted" to get where it is and (in my view) should not be seen as a commercial sportive, I believe most profit goes to charity. The sponsors are needed as the event has grown so large the Lakes Club can't manage it themselves.

In spirit it is a road cycling challenge dedicated to Fred.

Additional to this - it's popularity means that they have installed a permanent timing system so you can ride an 'all seasons Fred' any day of the year. In simple terms you can log an 'official' time any day of the year...
Image
User avatar
Single Speed George
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:36 pm
Location: Shap

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Single Speed George »

i think what im getting at by posting this is more about how biking can become to arrogent its all biking and its an open chalange event. like most sportives it is full of expensive bikes and castellie etc all a bit off putting and im an ok cyclinst so if it is of fputting for me imagine how less confident (but equily fit people feel about sportives) these are meant to be for everyone (i now the fred is much harder than most ) its just the atitude of the road cycling comunity (some signifcant parts anyway) beeing detrimental to cycling as a whole gets me
User avatar
Single Speed George
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:36 pm
Location: Shap

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Single Speed George »

and unlike the 3 peaks (as mentioned ) it is not a race so doesnt have such rules
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 24197
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

C'mon, I think we can all agree that the real question here is, how does he deliver Milk Tray on his fat bike with arms that finish at the elbow? :???:

Image
May the bridges you burn light your way
cyclingtiger
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:18 pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by cyclingtiger »

To be fair to the 3 peaks, it's really only a race for about 20-30 people. For the other 600+ riders it's just a challenge.
User avatar
Alpinum
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Alpinum »

Bearbonesnorm wrote:[...] arms that finish at the elbow?
That's what happens if you ride fat bikes on the road
JezS
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 10:04 am

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by JezS »

Of course, things may have changed with the explosion in popularity of road biking, Crikey, how much and assos in recent years but... when I rode the Fred (about 7 years ago) there was nothing elitist about it at all. It was a bunch of nice, down to earth people who organised an excellent road cycling event that was worthy of it's claim to be one of the hardest events out there.

I'm sure they're not trying to be elitist in banning fatbikes, just trying to maintain the overall theme of the Fred which is a serious road ride... where do you draw the line? unicycles, fatbikes, fixies, penny-farthings? In fact, I'm surprised they allow mountain bikes at all, as the main challenge is getting your road gearing over the steep lakeland passes... (although I'm happy to admit that I used a 32 cassette ring :oops: )

Hats off to the guys who want to do it on the fatties though - that'll be a huge day out!..good luck!
User avatar
ZeroDarkBivi
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:18 am
Location: Somerset

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by ZeroDarkBivi »

Alpinum wrote:Ach well, in the end it's a stupid place to take a fat bike
Exactly. Why would anybody want to, unless they where just an attention seeking egomaniac? Of course as these nice gentlemen are doing it for charity, they are beyond criticism. So I'm sure they will be just as happy to ride the route any of the 364 days of the year when they don't require the organisers to bend themselves out of shape to fit their schedule. Or perhaps they could just set themselves a different challenge more appropriate to fat tyres such of which I believe there are now quite a few to choose from.
cyclingtiger
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:18 pm
Location: Sheffield

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by cyclingtiger »

To be fair to the guys, and pretty much anyone else out there not wishing to quietly conform to life's norms and standards, challenge and appropriate aren't words that readily go hand in hand. People looking to test themselves in different and more challenging ways aren't automatically egomaniacs.
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 24197
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

Yeah, yeah all those points about challenge, elitism, charity and ego are all well and good .... but what about the bloody chocolates! There's desperate housewifes all round the country, clutching their satin nighties and just waiting for him to deliver them something special.

See, full length arms and fingers.

Image
May the bridges you burn light your way
User avatar
Ian
Posts: 4658
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:10 pm
Location: Scotlandshire
Contact:

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Ian »

Going by the thread title, I was expecting to see a post by Fantastic Matt saying how he hasn't done enough training for the event...


;)
User avatar
fatbikephil
Posts: 7386
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:51 pm
Location: Fife
Contact:

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by fatbikephil »

My question is why would you.... I'm fat bike daft but there is no way I'd ever ride one up hardknott pass, especially given the plethora of super techy off road alternatives in that neck of the woods. Sounds like a lack of imagination by the two riders - someone tell 'em to do the Lakeland 200!
User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:31 am

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Matt »

Ian wrote:Going by the thread title, I was expecting to see a post by Fantastic Matt saying how he hasn't done enough training for the event...


;)
Many a true word said in jest!!
touch
Posts: 287
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:11 pm
Location: Highlands

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by touch »

Single Speed George wrote:i think what im getting at by posting this is more about how biking can become to arrogent its all biking and its an open chalange event.
I think it's more arrogant to choose to do a ride like this in an intentionally slow manner. It's making all the helpers who are there to keep you fed and keep you safe give up much more of their time to suit you.
User avatar
Richard G
Posts: 5053
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 9:09 am
Location: South Wales

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Richard G »

Would be genuinely cool to see someone do it on a fatbike in a reasonable time. Though I suspect there's only a handful of riders capable of it.
User avatar
Richpips
Posts: 2241
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:57 pm
Location: Peak District

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Richpips »

Ridden the route a couple of times;
Top route Rubbish idea for a big event though.
User avatar
Single Speed George
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:36 pm
Location: Shap

Re: To fat for the fred...

Post by Single Speed George »

touch wrote:
Single Speed George wrote:i think what im getting at by posting this is more about how biking can become to arrogent its all biking and its an open chalange event.
I think it's more arrogant to choose to do a ride like this in an intentionally slow manner. It's making all the helpers who are there to keep you fed and keep you safe give up much more of their time to suit you.
i dont agree that they should do it if they needed the early start time etc dont get me wrong but if you were fit enough to make it round in a normal ish time on a ft bike then should be able to. espechially as manny people end up pushing up the hard bits anyway . but yes if you are going to do it on the day it should be in the alloted time of cource. its all a bit nuts anyway putting that manny people on the cource at one tme anyway. kind chaos in the lakes
Post Reply