
Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
I have been looking forward to Stu's review of the Stooge ever since he put it together, checking the "reviews and ramblings" section on an almost daily basis. Then today, there it is! But alas no, it's just an intro. Stu, you are a tease
. Still, at least I know a full ride review is imminent. I will just have to be patient for a little longer.

- Bearbonesnorm
- Posts: 24197
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Location: my own little world
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Nearly finished it Ray ... couple of days at most. 

May the bridges you burn light your way
- johnnystorm
- Posts: 4009
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:55 pm
- Location: Eastern (Anglia) Front
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
He's scratching his head trying to think of a new way off saying "laterally stiff, but vertically compliant". 


Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Of course there also has to be at least one action shot with elbows out and gurning mbuk stylee!
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
theres a pint from me if you can get 'buttery smooth' in there as well 

- Bearbonesnorm
- Posts: 24197
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Location: my own little world
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
May the bridges you burn light your way
- Cheeky Monkey
- Posts: 3918
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:48 pm
- Location: Leeds ish
- Contact:
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Nicely written.
"Colonial Sanders" made me laugh
"Colonial Sanders" made me laugh

Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Well that passed quick. Anyhow, now I want one. Not sure when I will have the money to buy one but it will be a lot sooner than the Shand I was dreaming ofs8tannorm wrote:Nearly finished it Ray ... couple of days at most.

Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Great write up. Thanks.
I'd have been very interested if I hadn't just bought my Solaris. Especially the rigid part, as firstly that was what I started out on like so many, plus I'm still not overly convinced by the x fusion forks on mine.
I'd have been very interested if I hadn't just bought my Solaris. Especially the rigid part, as firstly that was what I started out on like so many, plus I'm still not overly convinced by the x fusion forks on mine.
- Charliecres
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:28 pm
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.

Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Anyone bike packed on one yet? How big a frame bag will it take? If it will only take a small frame bag and given the standover height would it be feasible to add a small bag on top of the top tube and butting up against the seat tube/seat post?
- Bearbonesnorm
- Posts: 24197
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Location: my own little world
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
The triangle is surprisingly big, certainly big enough for a worthwhile frame bag.Anyone bike packed on one yet? How big a frame bag will it take? If it will only take a small frame bag and given the standover height would it be feasible to add a small bag on top of the top tube and butting up against the seat tube/seat post?
May the bridges you burn light your way
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Well written, informative and entertaining. Thanks for sharing.s8tannorm wrote:http://bearbonesbikepacking.blogspot.co ... whats.html
Any idea how it would compare to a 29erd Krampus?
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Pity the Purple is limited, looks interesting but don't think I can afford to get one for a while.
Also Stu I don't understand what would be changed by moving the bottom bracket round. Can you explain more?
Also Stu I don't understand what would be changed by moving the bottom bracket round. Can you explain more?
- Bearbonesnorm
- Posts: 24197
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Location: my own little world
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
My thinking was that dropping the BB would drop my weight / CoG. This wouldn't make any real difference climbing seated but when stood on technical climbs, it might ... very difficult to say whether it did or whether it was just in my head but there was certainly a difference afterwards.Also Stu I don't understand what would be changed by moving the bottom bracket round. Can you explain more?
Not really but I believe the geo' of both bikes is noticeably different ... Burty has one of each I recall.Any idea how it would compare to a 29erd Krampus?
May the bridges you burn light your way
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
Stu, maybe you just needed more time on the bike to get used to the new geometry.
- Bearbonesnorm
- Posts: 24197
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Location: my own little world
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
It's possible Ray ... I'll give it a few weeks then change it back and see what happens (if anything).Stu, maybe you just needed more time on the bike to get used to the new geometry.
May the bridges you burn light your way
- Charliecres
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:28 pm
Re: Stu's Stooge review part one, what a tease.
I'm running mine SS with the BB as far back as it will go while tensioning the chain (ie pretty much all the way) and I find it climbs easily as well as my Inbred used to. Different kettle of fish on the downs, though. 
