Bearbonesnorm wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 6:08 pm
I think there's a real demand for easy off road (i.e. traffic free) trails that you could ride on what continental Europeans would call a trekking bike and what we used to call a hybrid. Many people just don't want to mix with the ever-increasing traffic on the roads, but aren't adrenaline-pumped trail centre types either.
That is exactly what the press spiel said Jack and it's bang on right ... but then they went and spoilt it
We're back at the 'what is adventure' question (referring to gravel bikes is absolutely legit - they're the hybrids of today).
The Crane cousins once defined an adventure as “problems we couldn’t predict yet which we could survive”. They believed a good adventure should be “difficult without being agonising, dangerous without being suicidal, exotic without being obscure and awkward without being impossible.”
An element of difficulty, jeopardy and novelty is essential to it, but this will be highly subjective. One person's leisurely pootle is another person's near death experience. (On that point, maybe we should envy the people who find it easy to experience "an adventure" because of their youth and / or inexperience. Whereas the older / more experienced among us have to undertake ever more obscure and risky endeavours to get an adventure / jeopardy fix).
I used to think Adventure Cycling was long distance cycle touring (as in the Adventure Cycling Association in America) but with the era of Microadventures it's come to mean any kind of cycling where the objective isn't primarily about sport, fitness or utility cycling, but more to do with engaging with your surroundings, going somewhere new, maybe getting lost but not minding too much. Not sure how way marked trails fit into that, but maybe for some (many) people, it's adventure enough just to get out of the car and onto a bike for an afternoon.