Borderer wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:14 pm
It's a personal bugbear and I realise that not all women agree, but I really wish people would stop calling us 'ladies'. It's seriously patronising. Mind you, 'girls' is even worse.
Just back from cleaning my foot from the oversized cow pat I'd stood in
It seems that all terms come with some form of "baggage" depending on the speaker/writer and listener/reader. It does depend on the context to some degree which makes things even more complicated. I do agree on the misuse of "girls" when describing/addressing "women" though.
Almost back on topic (and not MuddyPete's sidetrack

), I've spoken before with Stu about the low numbers of women in bikepacking events. Four out of fifty three, that's just 7%, but sadly it's not unusual, I'm membership secretary of a running club and we've just 9% female members which is frankly embarrassing. The overall numbers are low, typically about double those of this year's BB200, so just a single extra woman can make quite a difference to the headline figure but things are improving in that the last five years have seen new female members comprising between 12% & 20% of the total.
I don't see why a women's LHC wouldn't work - our cycling club has a women only evening ride every week and keeps going (mostly) even through winter. They also partake in the main club rides so they aren't a clique within the club.