PaulB2 wrote:accountants...Chicken Legs wrote:I am not sure who thought a PF30 was progress !!PaulB2 wrote:Press- fit is already on the wane againChicken Legs wrote:I would like a bottom bracket that doesn't creak !!
Sounds about right

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
PaulB2 wrote:accountants...Chicken Legs wrote:I am not sure who thought a PF30 was progress !!PaulB2 wrote:Press- fit is already on the wane againChicken Legs wrote:I would like a bottom bracket that doesn't creak !!
Yes. For the first time in my life a 29" feels as stiff as a 26" bike. Boost axles, regular db spokes and carbon rims that are 100-120 g (front) and 50-70 g (rear) lighter than a comparably sized (width, not stiffness) alloy rim.ctznsmith wrote:Re: technological change it's axle standards that really bug me.
Do people actually notice the difference and is it beneficial?
That highlights some of the (not very scientific but entirely personal) thoughts that I have about some developments.Alpinum wrote: Yes. For the first time in my life a 29" feels as stiff as a 26" bike. Boost axles, regular db spokes and carbon rims that are 100-120 g (front) and 50-70 g (rear) lighter than a comparably sized (width, not stiffness) alloy rim.
No more über compliance and soggy feel due to flexing frame and wheels.
As a schoolboy doing Judo lessons I learnt how to roll out of a throw; now in my 60th year I still practice this with alarming regularity during bike rides...Lawmanmx wrote:most people will continue to ride without progress as they Never seem to practice ANY skills during their rides, skills always need to be honed and repeated else they be lost forever (or until you decide to spend time renewing them) but as we get older our urge to do anything that might hurt us wains further and further into the past, when i ride i always try and practice some of the basic skills just to keep a slight edge, where most just go pedal their bikes for miles and miles and miles ect ect ect, not that there's anything wrong with that, but your skills could be called upon at any time during any ride to simply stop you getting hurt ..... so keep yer tools sharp kids![]()
Very true Tony ... I often tell folk that they need to spend more time simply 'nobbing about' on their bike. It produces the occasional sideways looknot just riding sections BUT practicing basic skills like balance, braking, cornering, body position and obviously trail furniture
Bearbonesnorm wrote:Very true Tony ... I often tell folk that they need to spend more time simply 'nobbing about' on their bike. It produces the occasional sideways looknot just riding sections BUT practicing basic skills like balance, braking, cornering, body position and obviously trail furniture
Why will nothing ever be learned by that?Lawmanmx wrote:Bearbonesnorm wrote:Very true Tony ... I often tell folk that they need to spend more time simply 'nobbing about' on their bike. It produces the occasional sideways looknot just riding sections BUT practicing basic skills like balance, braking, cornering, body position and obviously trail furniture
indeed Stu, loads of peeps i know who ride just wanna smash tons of miles out every ride (again, which is fine) but nothing will ever be learned by doing that and there is Sooooo much fun to be had by as you say 'Nobbing about'
Wot he wrote. +1. Kintail is on my I really need to try and get this done this year list. Along with the GGW and the outer hebrides....Piemonster wrote:*Waves*Indeed, I need to go back to Kintail with the Occam (and some company).
I'll still get off and push any scary bits admittedly.
You need to ask!?! Have you learnt nothing...!Dave Barter wrote:
Why will nothing ever be learned by that?
I guess if you just ride straight through everything, you won't know if your improving or not. If you have to stop and try again, then you're learning the process involved and coming away a better rider.psling wrote:You need to ask!?! Have you learnt nothing...!Dave Barter wrote:
Why will nothing ever be learned by that?![]()
![]()
(thought the same thing myself actually Dave)
Less than you might think Bob ... technique is technique and it's surprising what you can learn with something as simple as a kerb.The biggest problem might be infrastructure if you want to learn jumps for example.
Don't come back at me with your hi-tech solutions! Kerb indeedBearbonesnorm wrote:Less than you might think Bob ... technique is technique and it's surprising what you can learn with something as simple as a kerb.The biggest problem might be infrastructure if you want to learn jumps for example.
Bob in a week or so...Bearbonesnorm wrote:Less than you might think Bob ... technique is technique and it's surprising what you can learn with something as simple as a kerb.The biggest problem might be infrastructure if you want to learn jumps for example.