29er maths question
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:01 pm
i've been thinking about whether or not to convert my new 29er to a 1x9 set-up and i stumbled upon some maths-based potential issues which i'm bringing up here to either be confirmed or poo-poo'd.
the idea is this.....
if i'm running a 1x9 set-up with, for example, a 32T chainring up front and a 9spd 12-36T cassette at the rear then i get a certain set of gear ratios.
but.....i'm forgetting to calculate the circumference of the wheel itself.
surely there'd be a noticeable difference in running this same gearing ratio on both a 26er and a 29er - no???
the logic seems to me to work: moving the same amount of weight (bike and rider) over different distances (the circumference of the wheel) using the same (for example 32T front and 16T rear = 2:1 ratio) would require increased energy input for a 29er.
sooo.....is this:
a) something that is common knowledge and i'm just catching up
b) nonsense and i'm overlooking something obvious
c) true and i'm some kind of geometrical genius
what do we think....?
the idea is this.....
if i'm running a 1x9 set-up with, for example, a 32T chainring up front and a 9spd 12-36T cassette at the rear then i get a certain set of gear ratios.
but.....i'm forgetting to calculate the circumference of the wheel itself.
surely there'd be a noticeable difference in running this same gearing ratio on both a 26er and a 29er - no???
the logic seems to me to work: moving the same amount of weight (bike and rider) over different distances (the circumference of the wheel) using the same (for example 32T front and 16T rear = 2:1 ratio) would require increased energy input for a 29er.
sooo.....is this:
a) something that is common knowledge and i'm just catching up
b) nonsense and i'm overlooking something obvious
c) true and i'm some kind of geometrical genius
what do we think....?