
Just over 50KM, in the same amount of time I used to do 60KM, so the fitness is still lacking...

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
Yes! Most ride are punctuated with stops to take photos, definitely not stops to catch my breath and have a rest...Bearlegged wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 11:25 amHave you factored in the time for stopping and taking such lovely pictures?![]()
Thanks Phil. Yes, lovely is traffic. Last time (years ago, pre Covid... noone knew ICU nurses save lives back then) I tried to get past the blocked motorway and I met an officer of the law blocking people from going via the posh(er) area. With my dyslexia and the satnav it was the only option I had - last minute agency nurse they needed at the same place before me becoming a regular - but waving my badge proudly and explaining my situation did nothing. Just looked through me and pointedfatbikephil wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:07 pm Good bit of 'Adventure Commuting' there Shaf, particularly when the water reached your...err. chest (OK that was on another ride but even so) Just think you could have taken the motor and the only thing you'd have to contend with was getting stuck in traffic![]()
Been chatting to our insider at Central Beds Council and it seems our little cat-amongst-the-pigeons report has had an effect - half a million quid has been obtained from various sources and a number of our suggestions will be implemented along with a view to looking at the other 'harder' ones afterwards. So that's rather gratifying! In fact we've been asked to do two more similar reports for the southern estates and also links to surrounding villages. I must find out how much Atkins or someone would have charged to do themfatbikephil wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 6:12 pmBeen involved in this for a good while being a Transport Planner for a few years and now Traffic Management; in my local Council. Generally we, as Councils, end up having to pick up the pieces (and get all the complaints, long after the Developer has scarpered) but with BA cash and in many cases no option due to land ownership....RIP wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 6:28 pm Our town is being massively expanded from its eastern boundary with new housing estates and some industrial areas. We've had several previous expansions in other directions and every time have been promised "infrastructure" (shops, pubs, etc) which of course never materialises - how to bugger up a perfectly nice market town in one easy lesson. Anyway, some of us in our local "Cycle Forum" group noticed the new eastern estates were rapidly appearing (the usual balsawood-framed and cardboard-clad type of house, wouldn't touch one with a bargepole myself). There are four existing major roads running out of the town and therefore through these new estates, plus there will be a new "arc" road linking these four roads. It soon became obvious that nobody had made any effort to plan the integration of these new estates with the existing town. Along more or less the whole boundary is an existing 10' steel fence so there is no "permeability" for non-vehicular transport (ie walking and cycling). Additionally, the four main roads have no cycle tracks next to them and in one case no pavement at all on one side! So much for "sustainability". The town is cut off from the new estates and vice versa. The excuse has been "oh they were planned 15 years ago". Livid is an understatement.
We raised our observations with a number of local councillors and now all hell has broken loose. We've been asked to conduct a survey of the situation so that "someone" can make a last-minute attempt at rectifying the mess. So myself and a Forum colleague rode the whole area today and took 70 photos of blockages, cockups, fences and whatnot. However we also found nine places where some access could be created. So maybe hope is not lost and the developers will be forced to provide these access points. Of course, they say "we've done our bit with 3m paths within the estates, not our problem". Usual hand-washing bollocks. So I'm now writing the report.
Good effort Reg, keep up the good work. Atkins would have charged c£50k and then F.I.URIP wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 10:50 pmBeen chatting to our insider at Central Beds Council and it seems our little cat-amongst-the-pigeons report has had an effect - half a million quid has been obtained from various sources and a number of our suggestions will be implemented along with a view to looking at the other 'harder' ones afterwards. So that's rather gratifying! In fact we've been asked to do two more similar reports for the southern estates and also links to surrounding villages. I must find out how much Atkins or someone would have charged to do themfatbikephil wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 6:12 pmBeen involved in this for a good while being a Transport Planner for a few years and now Traffic Management; in my local Council. Generally we, as Councils, end up having to pick up the pieces (and get all the complaints, long after the Developer has scarpered) but with BA cash and in many cases no option due to land ownership....RIP wrote: ↑Thu Nov 25, 2021 6:28 pm Our town is being massively expanded from its eastern boundary with new housing estates and some industrial areas. We've had several previous expansions in other directions and every time have been promised "infrastructure" (shops, pubs, etc) which of course never materialises - how to bugger up a perfectly nice market town in one easy lesson. Anyway, some of us in our local "Cycle Forum" group noticed the new eastern estates were rapidly appearing (the usual balsawood-framed and cardboard-clad type of house, wouldn't touch one with a bargepole myself). There are four existing major roads running out of the town and therefore through these new estates, plus there will be a new "arc" road linking these four roads. It soon became obvious that nobody had made any effort to plan the integration of these new estates with the existing town. Along more or less the whole boundary is an existing 10' steel fence so there is no "permeability" for non-vehicular transport (ie walking and cycling). Additionally, the four main roads have no cycle tracks next to them and in one case no pavement at all on one side! So much for "sustainability". The town is cut off from the new estates and vice versa. The excuse has been "oh they were planned 15 years ago". Livid is an understatement.
We raised our observations with a number of local councillors and now all hell has broken loose. We've been asked to conduct a survey of the situation so that "someone" can make a last-minute attempt at rectifying the mess. So myself and a Forum colleague rode the whole area today and took 70 photos of blockages, cockups, fences and whatnot. However we also found nine places where some access could be created. So maybe hope is not lost and the developers will be forced to provide these access points. Of course, they say "we've done our bit with 3m paths within the estates, not our problem". Usual hand-washing bollocks. So I'm now writing the report.
.
Have they got a sale onfatbikephil wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 11:22 pm Good effort Reg, keep up the good work. Atkins would have charged c£50k and then F.I.U
Nice one Phil. I had planned to do 65 or 100 (meaning it would come to either 100km or miles) but the old knee didn't recover in time. Anyway, I'm in mate and will try and cover the lost few months aswellfatbikephil wrote: ↑Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:16 pm First 100 miler of the year today. The plan had been to do one a month but that flew out the window in January so I'll try and do a few doubles to ensure I've 12 under my belt by the year end. Anyway it was a pleasant trundle around fair Fife with the easterly providing a generous tailwind on the way back. With 8k to go I realised I was going to be 5k short of the century so threw in an extra loop (and another huge climb) to hit the magic 100. Oh and it was totally dry which makes a change this year.
Good one, we need to keep reminding each other!redefined_cycles wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:00 amNice one Phil. I had planned to do 65 or 100 (meaning it would come to either 100km or miles) but the old knee didn't recover in time. Anyway, I'm in mate and will try and cover the lost few months aswellfatbikephil wrote: ↑Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:16 pm First 100 miler of the year today. The plan had been to do one a month but that flew out the window in January so I'll try and do a few doubles to ensure I've 12 under my belt by the year end. Anyway it was a pleasant trundle around fair Fife with the easterly providing a generous tailwind on the way back. With 8k to go I realised I was going to be 5k short of the century so threw in an extra loop (and another huge climb) to hit the magic 100. Oh and it was totally dry which makes a change this year.![]()
Yes. Am definitely in for this Phil. Watch this space. First ride coming shortly and definitely needed something to encourage me to get out there.fatbikephil wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:31 pmGood one, we need to keep reminding each other!redefined_cycles wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:00 amNice one Phil. I had planned to do 65 or 100 (meaning it would come to either 100km or miles) but the old knee didn't recover in time. Anyway, I'm in mate and will try and cover the lost few months aswellfatbikephil wrote: ↑Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:16 pm First 100 miler of the year today. The plan had been to do one a month but that flew out the window in January so I'll try and do a few doubles to ensure I've 12 under my belt by the year end. Anyway it was a pleasant trundle around fair Fife with the easterly providing a generous tailwind on the way back. With 8k to go I realised I was going to be 5k short of the century so threw in an extra loop (and another huge climb) to hit the magic 100. Oh and it was totally dry which makes a change this year.![]()